Political Search Marketing: Electronic Grass Roots

In Candidates Need SEO, Scott Willoughby examined the need for political parties and candidates to begin serious search marketing. Scott’s analysis is excellent as far as it went, but he missed the big picture. SEO and PPC for candidate sites is a tiny piece of the potential of search expertise to impact elections.

Joe Trippi, the former campaign manager for Howard Dean and current campaign manager for John Edwards, pioneered the use of the internet in presidential campaign. He was very successful raising money through small donations and using the internet to coordinate local supporters and events. Groups such as Move On have taken that example and refined the model to develop virtual communities and infrastructure that brings together supporters into physical meetings.

Candidates from both parties have borrowed heavily from these ideas. Their sites offer calls to action: donate money, volunteer, create a personalized version of the site (McCainSpace, my.barackobama.com), plan or attend an event, register for emails, download flyers and other ways to harness the energy of their base. The Edwards campaign even has a section on “Action For Bloggers”, although it is unclear what they have in mind.

Candidates and parties need to broaden their view of the internet and see beyond the fund raising channel and a way to interact with supporters, so they can unleash the power of Electronic Grass Roots. Political pundits and organizers frequently refer to the grass roots and the ground game as important factors in winning elections. They stress the ability to get people on the streets, knocking on doors and engaging their friends and family to support the candidate. The internet provides new vehicles for individuals to impact the outcome of an election.

Individual Persuasion:

Individual users, bloggers and webmasters can influence others through posts, comments and discussions. Virtual conversations take place over time and without the pressure of a face-to-face interaction. They can be viewed by thousands of people and provoke additional discussion threads. Virtual campaigning by individuals can be at least as powerful as persuading people by knocking on doors.

Social Media Action:

Political operatives have not begun to understand the collective power of a group of hundreds of thousands of people as social media activists. Reddit, Digg and other crowd sourcing platforms are among the most heavily trafficked sites in America. It only takes 50 or 100 votes on these sites to make an article “popular” and perhaps a couple of thousand votes to keep it on the homepage for a day or more. Even the “marginal” presidential candidates can muster enough support to generate exposure for their point of view or to promote articles and sites that support them into the public discussion.

Search Results As Truth:

For most people, (even the few Americans who are not search professionals 🙂 ) the internet has become the way to get more information about almost any topic. The top 10 or maybe 20 results are the entire consideration set for people who want to learn about an issue or the candidates.

The true power in Electronic Grass Roots is the ability to affect search results. The power of a few hundred sites to influence search results has been demonstrated over and over again. We’re not talking about Google Bombing, we are talking about SEO and reputation management strategies combined with an organizied effort that influences link acquisition and/or distribution.

An army of hundreds of thousands supporters — orchestrated by a party, a presidential candidate or an interest group with a sophisticated knowledge of search optimization — has the ability to promote virtually any websites, articles and position it near the top of the search results for a given query.

The ham handed political SEO might focus on Rudolph Giuliani in drag, kissing Donald Trump or the fact that Giuliani , a Roman Catholic, demonstrated the strength of his convictions by getting divorced twice, including an annulment after 18 years of being married to his cousin. Ranking a YouTube video or a Wikipedia entry would not require a Herculean effort. Likewise, John McCain cannot escape his defense of Bush’s War in Iraq or the fact that McCain has new bedfellows the Right Wing, such as Paul Weyrich, Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson.

The subtle operative will recognize that this strategy is also effective when employed with a subtle hand. It is much more powerful to assassinate someone character by talking about a $400 haircut than attack John Edwards on the environment .

Pushing a highly negative article from a right wing pundit to the top will be much less effective at reinforcing peoples’ reservations about Hillary Clinton than promoting the New York Times article about Bill Clinton being Strategist in Chief. Equally important, it wouldn’t take a lot of external validation to rank an article from the Times that already contains plenty of content and keywords.

As for Barack Obama, his early opposition to the war in Iraq will have the manipulators of the Right pushing stories linking him with the NAACP in supporting immigrants’ rights.

Who needs talking points when you can get Google, Yahoo and MSN to tell your story. That’s the power of Electronic Grass Roots.

Google Sues SEO Company For Revealing Algorithm Secrets

Yes, the title is link bait…but it serves as the perfect example to prove our point. Need new link bait? Have someone threaten to sue you.

Legal action or the threat of legal action can strike a viral nerve that the savvy search marketer can cook into irresistibly tasty link bait. A large corporation suing an individual, a small business or a group can flavor the dish with essence of David versus Goliath. Stir in a threat of a punishment that is disproportional to the cause of action and you have a recipe that can satisfy your link and traffic cravings.

Last weeks’ firestorm of inDiggnation illustrated the potential of a cease and desist notice to create a media and blog feeding frenzy. In case you were dead last week, or hibernating in some part of the world that doesn’t have an internet connection or newspaper, we’ll summarize the story for you. It all began when Digg executives decided to kill a story about the HD-DVD encryption key in response to a DMCA request. Digg CEO Jay Adelson wrote about the the decision to bow to a cease and desist declaration and remove stories related to the “HD-DVD Hack”. Adelson’s post received about 5,300 back links in less than a week.

The decision created a mutiny by Diggers, who proceeded to submit and promote dozens of other pages about the HD-DVD key while burying everything else. The Digg moderators fought off the Mutiny for a few hours before being overwhelmed. By midnight, Digg’s homepage had been completely taken over by protesters. The next morning, Digg waived the white flag when Kevin Rose posted the HD DVD encryption key along with a message that they had given up trying to oppose the will of the Digg Community. That post gathered another 16,000 20,750 links.

The story broke to the mainstream press, getting coverage (and links) from hundreds of media outlets, including CNet, MSNBC, AP, Forbes, Newsday, PC World, USA Today, ZD Net, InfoWorld, MacWorld and the New York Times.

You don’t need to be Digg or the victim of a RIAA lawsuit for legal action to become viral. Breast feeding advocate –and Search Engine Guide editor– Jennifer Laycock turned a clever t-shirt and a cease and desist letter from an overzealous trademark attorney representing the American Pork Board into a viral firestorm and 2,954 links. A story about a judge losing his pants and suing for $67 million gathered 3,566 diggs – although this story appears to have only collected about a dozen links.

Eric Ward, in his post on The Coming Link Apocalypse, wrote about the rapid depreciation in value from traditional link building campaigns.

You aren’t doing anything wrong, and you do your job well. You try hard. You are conscientious. You care. But no matter the content subject, what I have seen over the past five or six years that link building has gone mainstream is a herd mentality. Everyone uses the same tools, the same tactics, the same tricks, the same companies, the same link requests, the same link-ridden press releases, the same approaches, with almost no thought or differentiation.

We are big fans of Eric and have utilized his services for our clients. He is most likely right that many link baiting strategies acquire links that are of dubious value over the long haul. On the other hand, the sue or be sued approach can create a “real story” and yield the type of high quality editorial links from main stream media outlets that are unlikely to quickly depreciate.

The Digg story is the extreme examples that illustrates the point, but a search of Google News for April 4th to May 4th shows over 22,000 results for stories that contain the word “sued” or “sues”. The media outlets that Google crawls for news syndication are, by definition, high quality editorial sites that can deliver the link juice we are all looking for.

If you enjoy playing with fire and you have the stomach for lawsuits or cease and desist orders, “sue or be sued” might be a strategy for to pursue. For the other 99% of us, if you do find yourself in the unfortunate position of receiving a summons or a cease and desist letter, see if you can make links out of lemons.

Google Drops The Bomb: Hand Job or Cron Job?

ColbertNation.com is no longer showing in the Google SERP for greatest living American or giant brass balls. Google defused the bomb almost exactly two weeks after Mr. Sullivan reported its success.

The Google Bombing experiment has left us with a lot of unanswered questions. The most interesting one is whether their “anti bombing algorithm” has some chronological component which allows the page to rank for a couple of weeks before killing it completely or it was removed by manual intervention.

Did the Algorithm Kill the Colbert Nation or did Google executives decide he wasn’t the greatest living American?

What do you think?

Who Coined the Acronym “SEO”?

It’s a “food for thought” Friday at Alchemist, and we’ve just stumbled upon a press release that triggered quite a debate – in which a large media agency states that their CEO coined the acronym. However, since naming names and sending out links could result in some kind of, um… Googlebomb… 😉 … we won’t give that information until we get some feedback from the industry. Can the search community come to an agreement on who coined the acronym “SEO”?

Here is an interesting post on the subject: Who Invented the Term “Search Engine Optimization”?

Obviously the term came before the acronym – so who came up with both?

Hinting along… it was possibly coined either in 1995 or 1996.

Google Bombing Lessons

Colbert Nation Acknowledges Results

Danny Sullivan wrote about our successful bomb Friday. Beside the fact that he enjoyed the Mission Accomplished post, Mr. Sullivan provided his analysis about the reasons our recent Google Bombing campaign was successful in spite of the fact that Google defused Google Bombing a few months ago. Mr. Sullivan observed that:

The Colbert Report’s home page uses NONE of the words (because Stephen, who is
modest, has no need to declare himself the greatest). Here’s Google confirming that the site ranks for that term solely based on links to it:


Stephen Colbert Cached Page

See the part at the bottom: “These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: greatest living american.”

So what’s the deal? Wasn’t the Google fix supposed to prevent this exact thing?

Yes, actually. Of course, we’ve had a few exceptions cited, such as click here ranking things like Adobe and Apple downloads. Maybe Google’s Matt Cutts will come along to shed some more light on the situation. I suspect the answer will be that the link bomb fix Google uses is more sophisticated than just looking to see if the words people are using in links, when a lot of links suddenly point at a page, actually appear on a page.

We originally targeted the “letter from Stephen” page and the “Balls For Kidz” pages for the campaign by choosing pages that already contained some of the target keywords in an attempt to get around the anti-bombing changes. What Mr. Sullivan is pointing out here is that because Google ranks the homepage first and the target pages below that for “greatest living american”, their anti-bombing algorithm is more subtle than we would assume from the appearance and disappearance of failure.

By contrast, Google ranks the “balls for kidz” page first for “giant brass balls” and doesn’t show the homepage at all.

This is diagnostically very interesting for SEO because one page has the words and the other doesn’t. The other data point that we can provide is that many people chose not to include the Giant Brass Balls campaign in their viral contributions. Google blog search indicates 17,972 posts in the last 8 days contain “greatest living american” versus 3,205 for “giant brass balls”.

On a related topic, how much traffic did this campaign send to ColbertNation.com? Any advertisers out there who can tell us?

Before this campaign started, neither Colbert Nation nor Comedy Central ranked for “greatest living american” or “giant brass balls”. Comedy Central ranked about 22nd for “truthiness.”

As of 1:41 pm pst on 4/23/2007, Colbertnation.com ranks #1 for “giant brass balls” on Google, MSN and Yahoo and #1 on Google, #3 on Yahoo and #3 on MSN for “greatest living american.” Comedy Central is up to #10 for truthiness.

My original post hit the homepage of Digg for 14 hours starting about midnight on 4/15 and received about 26,000 visitors by Monday, 4/16. Greg Jarboe at Search Engine Watch posted on Monday. His post hit the SERP by Tuesday along with my Alchemist Media post and one from the Bacon Nation. Colbert Nation started to move up.

On Wednesday afternoon, after SEOmoz joined the party and brought along a bunch of other SEO folks, Alchemist started both phrases in Adwords to judge the number of people running the query. We have seen 27,600 impressions in Google for “greatest living american” in the last 5 days. We got another 4074 on “giant brass balls” before Google decided our quality score was too low and that we would need to spend $10/click to keep it active. That’s too much to pay for data!

Direct traffic sources include at least 1 homepage Digg for Search Engine Land, a CNet News story and about 19,000 blog posts. Only Comedy Central can tell us for sure, but I have to guess this campaign has been worth at least 150,000 visitors in the last week.

I have heard numerous complaints the week of ColbertNation.com going down. Of course, ColbertNation.com seems to go down fairly regularly even without the Google Bomb.

It’s amazing how little Viacom seems to understand the web!

Mission Accomplished—Top Ranking in Google

Admiral Fishkin, Captain Rohrs, Fellow Officers, Diggers and Bloggers of the SEO world, my fellow Americans: Major combat in operation Giant Brass Balls have ended. In the Battle of the Greatest Living American, Colbert Nation and our allies have prevailed. And now our coalition is engaged in securing and reconstructing our hard earned ranking.

In this battle, we have fought for the cause of liberty, and for a piece of the SERP. Our nation and our coalition are proud of this accomplishment — yet it is you, the members of the Colbert Nation Strike Force, who achieved it. Your courage — your willingness to face danger for your country and for each other — made this day possible. Because of you, our nation is more secure. Because of you, the tyrant has fallen, and Serpia is free.

Operation Giant Brass Balls was carried out with a combination of precision and speed and boldness the enemy did not expect and the world had not seen before. From distant sites and blogs at sea, we sent links and anchors that destroyed the rank of our opposition and propelled a single target to the top. Webmasters and bloggers charged to the top across hundreds of intervening sites in one of the swiftest advances of ranking in search history. You have shown the world the skill and the might of Search Engine Optimization paired with the passion of Colbert Nation.

This nation thanks all of the members of our coalition who joined in a noble cause. We thank the Armed Forces of SEOmoz, The Bacon Nation, and SE Watch, who shared in the hardships of war. We thank all of the citizens of Digg who welcomed our troops and joined in the liberation in support of half a dozen guerrilla attacks. And tonight, I have a special word for Secretary Jarboe, for Generally Frank, and for all the men and women wear the flag of the Colbert Nation: Alchemist is grateful for a job well done.

The character of our military through history — the daring of Wikiality, the fierce courage of The White House Correspondents Dinner, the decency and idealism that turned enemies into allies — is fully present in this generation. When Serpian civilians looked into the faces of our servicemen and women, they saw strength, and kindness, and a sick sense of humor. When I look at the members of the Colbert Nation Strike Force, I see the best of our country, and I am honored to have served – temporarily- as your commander in chief.

In the images of fallen idols, we have witnessed the arrival of a new era. For a dozen years of search wars, culminating in the Google age, search technology was designed and deployed to inflict order on an ever-growing scale. In defeating keyword spam and imperial monopolies, Allied Forces destroyed entire portfolio, while leaders who escaped with golden parachutes and vested stock options. Market power was used to end regimes by breaking a company. With new tactics and precision weapons, we can achieve comedic objectives without directing violence against civilians. No device of man can remove the tragedy from war or avoid the detritus left behind by our campaign. With apologies to the brass ball industry, it wiil be a great advance when the politicians have far more to fear from search results than innocent, if obscure, awards.

In the images of celebrating SEO warriors, we have also seen the ageless appeal of victory. Decades of lies and intimidation could not make the Serpian people love their oppressors or desire their own enslavement. Men and women in every culture need natural search engine ranking like they need food and water and air. Everywhere that #1 position arrives, some human rejoices.

We have difficult work to do in Serpian. We are bringing order to parts of the results page that remain dangerous. We are pursuing and finding leaders of the old regime, who will be held to account for their crimes. We have begun the search positioning using biological weapons. We have already disclosed hundreds of sites that will be investigated. We are helping to rebuild Serpian, and we will stand with the writers of the show as they learn to establish a government of, by, and for the people of Colbert Nation. The transition from dictatorship to democracy took startling little time, but it is worth every effort. Our coalition will stay until our work is done. And then we will leave — and we will leave behind a new segment on our favorite show.

The Battle of Serpia is one victory in a war on hypocrisy that began on April 15, 2007. That terrible morning, three very tired men straggled home from New York — gave America and the civilized world a glimpse of their ambitions. They imagined, in the words of one bomber, that April 15th would be the "beginning of a really awesome new segment and maybe a chance to get a new client." By seeking to turn our web pages into tools of subversive ideas, Google Bombers and their allies believed that they could prove to this nation the power of our combined voices and force a new awareness on the world. It only took 7 days!.

Thank you for serving our country and our cause. May God bless you all, and may God continue to bless Stephen Colbert!

Yahoo Bombing For Stephen Colbert

The campaign to get the Colbert Show to rank for Giant Brass Balls and Greatest Living American has certainly got the blogosphere buzzing. In three days, it has generated no less that half a dozen digg post, including one that got about 1500 diggs (thanks Cameron), at least a couple dozen links and huge outcry of loyal fans.

We are happy to report that while Google is still showing a little resistance, (along with very unstable results that change every hour) the Colbert Nation is already the top 10 for Greatest Living American. Yahoo, meanwhile, is cooperating nicely; it shows number 1 for giant brass balls and greatest living american is 3rd.

MSN and Ask are picking up related stories, but neither is showing our hero in the top 10 yet.

April 19th update.

Colbert Nation is now #1 for Greatest Living American in Google and was number #1 in Yahoo and MSN this morning, but appears to have dropped back. Still no progress with Gooogle for Giant Brass Balls, but #1 in Yahoo.

Given the tremendous response we have seen today and the fact that most of the rest of the top 10 is taken up by posts about the campaign, we should be able to fly the Mission Accomplished Banner by Saturday.

Stephen Colbert Greatest Living American

Anointing Stephen Colbert as the Greatest Living American.

Alchemist Media was in New York this week, presenting at the Search Engine Strategies conference. President Jessie Stricchiola spoke on the Ad Copy & Landing Page Clinic panel and moderated the Advanced Paid Listings Panel.

In between sessions and networking events, we got a chance to see a taping of The Colbert Report hosted by Stephen Colbert, who was introduced as the greatest living american. During the Q&A period before the show we asked Mr. Colbert if he ever considered using his loyal following to influence Google results. After being told that yes, he could reasonable achieve top ranking for almost any key phrase he chose by asking his fans to link to ColbertNation.com with the correct anchor text, Mr. Colbert said he would like to rank first on Google for Giant Brass Balls. Well—that just seemed way too easy, so we decided to do some thinking to find other words that the show should rank for…

A quick check on Google shows he doesn’t even rank for Truthiness, a word he invented. So, Colbert Nation, we are not -ahem- suggesting a Google Bombing campaign… but isn’t it time to start linking to the Greatest Living American?

Get Top Six Google Positions for One Company

Search Engines figured out a decade ago that allowing a single company to dominate the results was a bad user experience. Even if a company was algorithmically determined to have 100 relevant page results, the engines limited their appearance in SERP to one or two listings. Google improved this practice by indenting the second result for the same site and displaying it below the first, making it easier for the user to navigate directly to the page they want.

UI changes by Google over the last few months have seemingly lost track of this simple concept and created an embarrassment of riches for some searches. Specifically, Google’s rules appear not to consider the interaction between Local, Sitebox and regular results.

Consider these searches for Berkeley Toyota and Apple.

Berkeley Toyota is clearly the BEST result for the first query; they shouldn’t get three listings in local, four more from a Sitebox and the top natural site below that. Depending on how you count, that’s the top five spots and eight listings.
Berkeley Toyota SERP

Apple gets six unique listings and ten links before the first non-Apple listing appears. Below the Wiki listings, Apple sub-domains scores another three of the next six listings and two more go to Mac.com. That means Apple owns 11 of the first 14 listings.
Apple Computer SERP

So, Google, how about fixing your rules here?

  1. If a site is given the SiteBox/Onebox position, that should be the only result on the page from that domain. At minimum, remove the natural search result.
  2. If a site is showing in local, it should suppress the OneBox listing. There is no point in showing both.
  3. Even if a company shows multiple locations in the same city, only use one spot in the local search.
  4. Sub-domains are considered “separate” sites, but if each sub-domains gets two spots in the SERP, even the purest White Hat SEO is going to be tempted to create five high quality “sites” and own the top ten.